Conflicts Galore: Upcoming Accelerated Approval Cancer Panel Includes Many Industry Relationships
US FDA issued six conflict-of-interest waivers for the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee’s three-day panel to consider whether indications for three immunotherapies – Tecentriq, Keytruda and Opdivo – should be withdrawn after failed clinical outcomes studies.
You may also be interested in...
Cancer Accelerated Approval On Trial: Advisors With Conflict-Of-Interest Waivers More Likely To Support Industry
US FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee panelists who were granted financial conflict-of-interest waivers to participate in the agency’s multi-day review of accelerated approvals for three immunotherapies voted in favor of keeping the indications at issue on market more than three-quarters of the time. Non-conflicted experts voted in favor only two-thirds of the time. One of the six panel outcomes would have been different without the conflicted members’ votes.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will meet for three days in April to consider whether indications for Tecentriq, Keytruda and Opdivo should remain on label despite failure to confirm clinical benefit; review is part of the Oncology Center of Excellence’s ‘industry-wide evaluation’ of accelerated approvals, which has led to withdrawals of four other PD-1/L-1 inhibitor claims.
FDA user fee reauthorization eliminates limits on waivers, which may ease the burden on FDA to fill open seats on its advisory committees. Vacancy rates have been as high as 24% in FY 2012.