Accelerated Approvals Could Be Improved By Focusing On Benefit/Risk, Making Withdrawal Easier
Executive Summary
Applying the expedited pathway in the context of a preliminary benefit/risk assessment, rather than focusing solely on predictive surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoints, would give the US FDA more flexibility, Friends of Cancer Research working group says in a new white paper.
You may also be interested in...
Sen. Wyden Using Califf Nomination To Extract Accelerated Approval Reforms
The unexpectedly tight fight to get Robert Califf confirmed as FDA commissioner is giving lawmakers additional leverage to extract commitments. However, the Senate Finance Chair may be overestimating FDA’s ability to swiftly pull accelerated approvals without new legislation.
Accelerated Approval Roadblock: Agenus’ PD-1 Stumble Reflects Pathway’s Regulatory Risk
Agenus was banking on US FDA taking the full six months to act on Keytruda application in same cervical cancer indication where it was seeking accelerated approval; agency took less than two months, making it among the fastest oncology supplemental approvals in the last two years.
Accelerated Approval: US FDA Wants Comprehensive Development Plan From Oncology Sponsors
Cancer drug developers should come to the agency early with a package of clinical trials to support accelerated approval and confirm clinical benefit rather than with plans to sequentially conduct such studies, Oncology Center of Excellence’s Richard Pazdur says; he also suggests closer scrutiny ahead of whether postmarketing trials are being conducted with ‘due diligence.’