Data Integrity ‘More Than Just A GMP Issue’ As Attention To Clinical, Nonclinical Lapses Grows
Executive Summary
Sponsors should notify US FDA quickly when they detect data quality issues in preclinical and clinical research, particularly for applications under review, experts say in a rebuke to Novartis’ delayed notification about Zolgensma data manipulation.
You may also be interested in...
Clinical Data Integrity: Clean US FDA Inspection No Guarantee That DoJ Won’t Investigate
Justice department has investigative tools that can uncover fraudulent activity even when a clinical site passes inspection, DoJ’s Clint Narver says; in deciding whether to self-report possible clinical trial fraud to FDA and DoJ, sponsors should consider that other companies would benefit from knowing this information about a particular site or investigator.
Clinical Data Fraud Involving CROs Attracting US Justice Department Attention
Submission of manipulated clinical data to support product approval is a ‘major concern’ for the DoJ, consumer protection branch director Gusav Eyler says, adding that some of the problems relate to outsourcing of trials. Also, DoJ and HHS OIG are using data analytics to identify outliers in prescribing and reimbursement claims.
Data Manipulation Not Common, But Happens "More Than I Would Have Expected," US FDA's Sharpless Says
As fallout from the Novartis Zolgensma data manipulation incident continues, US FDA acting commissioner Norman Sharpless notes that "at some level we have to trust the sponsors."