Biologic Product Naming: US FDA Sticks With Suffixes ‘Devoid Of Meaning’
Executive Summary
Final guidance adds new factors for biosimilar and innovative sponsors to consider in developing distinguishable suffixes for nonproprietary names but FDA is unswayed by calls for meaningful suffixes derived from license holder’s name; timing of retrospective application to previously approved products remains in question.
You may also be interested in...
FDA Biosimilars Acting Director Yim Is ‘Not A Great Fan’ Of Suffix-Based Naming Policy
Whether one accepts the view that concerns about active pharmacovigilance and the need to distinguish small molecules from biologics support the controversial nomenclature system is ‘a personal thing,’ Sarah Yim says.
US FDA Biosimilars Acting Director Yim ‘Not A Great Fan’ Of Suffix-Based Naming Policy
Whether one accepts the view that concerns about active pharmacovigilance and the need to distinguish small molecules from biologics support the controversial nomenclature system is ‘a personal thing,’ Sarah Yim says.
Policy Reversal: FDA Will No Longer Require Suffixes For Older Biologics
New US FDA draft guidance says that the agency will no longer change the proper names of originator biologics to include a four-letter suffix, although the agency will continue to attach suffixes to future approvals.