Challenge To Hain Celestial ‘Natural’ Claim Could Be On Hold Pending FDA Definition
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Hain Celestial is not out of the woods regarding its Jason natural claims as an appeals court reverses a dismissal of a false-advertising class action. However, because the court agrees FDA should have primary jurisdiction over natural cosmetics claims, the case could be stayed until the agency defines the term as it applies to cosmetics.
You may also be interested in...
Tom's natural claims on toothpastes and deodorants are false and misleading, a plaintiff alleges in a proposed class action filed in Massachusetts federal court. Similar to previous complaints against Colgate/Tom’s, the plaintiff’s case is premised on the contention that “natural,” as opposed to “100% natural,” means no synthetic ingredients.
The California Assembly Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials voted yes to proposed AB 495 at a 14 January hearing in Sacramento. As drafted, the bill continues to face industry opposition, but its author and cosponsors have committed to changes that would align the legislation more closely with EU regulations and potentially resolve industry’s biggest concerns.