P&G Might Need To Split, Divest To Stay Competitive – Analysts
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
P&G could benefit from splitting into two businesses, divesting its premium fragrances or pulling out of core personal care product categories, experts suggest. Financial services firm UBS says, “While P&G is stepping up its spending, cutting costs and accelerating new product launches – so are its competitors.”
You may also be interested in...
While the so-called fiscal cliff has been avoided, sequestration still looms for FDA and other government agencies. The European Chemicals Agency updates its list of Substances of Very High Concern.
With more power to shake up P&G’s board, shareholders could ultimately have a greater hand in changes to company management. Activist investor William Ackman – whose firm Pershing Square Capital owns roughly a 1% stake in the firm – is rumored to be pushing to replace P&G CEO Bob McDonald.
Procter & Gamble will slash prices on some products in the short term to halt U.S. market share erosion in categories where competitors did not previously raise prices. On the firm’s Q4 earnings call, executives defended their bullish growth and savings projections.