Meth ruling goes to pharma
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Twenty Arkansas counties failed to show pharmaceutical firms were responsible for the "societal effects of the methamphetamine epidemic," according to the Jan. 5 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to dismiss the counties' complaint. The counties alleged that the companies opposed regulatory efforts in order to reap profits from the sale of OTC cough/cold products with ephedrine or pseudoephedrine. Arkansas, which ordered behind-the-counter sales of PSE-containing products before the federal Combat Meth Act of 2006 was enacted, instituted e-tracking for PSE product sales in 2008 (1"The Tan Sheet" June 9, 2008, In Brief)
You may also be interested in...
Sales of OTC products containing pseudoephedrine across Arkansas are being tracked on a real-time statewide electronic logbook, state Attorney General Dustin McDaniel says June 4. Arkansas was among the states that imposed behind-the-counter sales of PSE-containing OTC products before the federal Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2006 required all states to implement sales restrictions as least as stringent (1"The Tan Sheet" July 3, 2006, p. 7). However, Arkansas found paper logbooks ineffective against meth makers who stock up on PSE drugs by visiting multiple retailers. Federal legislation, S. 1276, to fund electronic logs for states has stalled in the Senate, but Arkansas and other states - including Iowa, Oklahoma and Tennessee - have implemented their own tracking systems (2"The Tan Sheet" March 19, 2007, p. 11)...
Data presented at AAAI meeting show reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates across all patient populations, but doctors are unlikely to switch patients served well by existing biologics.
The RNA drug’s accelerated approval brings Sarepta’s exon-skipping market share to nearly 30%.