Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

EPA requests nano comment

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The Environmental Protection Agency invites public comment on several 1documents related to its Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program, EPA states July 11. The program, in part, aims to "increase the scientific understanding and ensure appropriate nanoscale industrial chemical to facilitate the responsible development of this growing technology," the agency says. The agency also requests comments on a concept paper for the NMSP, and on the information collection request for the program. The agency will conduct a public meeting Aug. 2 to receive comments on the NMSP; the comment period will remain open for 60 days after the meeting...

You may also be interested in...



Global Catastrophe Or Passing Nuisance? Pharma’s Coronavirus Views

While the global health threat from the now officially named SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has grown since the start of the quarterly earnings season in early February, even many of the companies reporting more recently do not appear overly concerned about potential business impact at this stage.

Sanofi Tries To Stop Lantus Biosimilar By Getting Supreme Court To Review PTAB, Again

Sanofi seeks to delay decision clearing path for Mylan's Lantus biosimilar; says it should be able to get rehearing based on Federal Circuit's ruling that PTAB judges were not constitutionally appointed.

Sanofi Improperly Listed Lantus Patent In FDA's Orange Book, Appeals Court Finds

First Circuit reverses dismissal of direct purchasers' suit alleging improper listing of patent on device drive mechanism delayed competition; district court to decide if this constitutes antitrust violation.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS100705

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel