Prop 65 Andro Settlements Include “Corrective Advertising” Provision

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

10 Jun 2002
News

The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Settling defendants in California's Prop 65 litigation against androstenedione supplement marketers would pay from $1,341 to $4,546 each to fund "corrective advertising" programs, according to proposed consent judgments filed in Oakland state court

Already Registered? Sign in to continue reading.

New to Pink Sheet? Start a free trial today!

Table
View full table

Topics

Industries
Consumer
Subjects
OTC Drugs

ASK THE ANALYST
Email

Print
Bookmark
Share

Tags:

Consumer OTC Drugs

You must sign in to use this functionality

Authentication.SignIn.HeadSignInHeader

PS094131

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel

PS094131

All set! This article has been sent to my@email.address.

All fields are required. For multiple recipients, separate email addresses with a semicolon.

Please Note: Only individuals with an active subscription will be able to access the full article. All other readers will be directed to the abstract and would need to subscribe.

Prop 65 Andro Settlements Include “Corrective Advertising” Provision

News

Executive Summary

Related Content

Topics

You must sign in to use this functionality

Authentication.SignIn.HeadSignInHeader

Register

Ask The Analyst

Email Article

Sign In To Set a Search Alert