Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Prop 65 and coal tar

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

California AG seeking new trial date against Tegrin dandruff shampoo marketer Reedco following settlements by other defendants in Prop 65 litigation. Under agreements not yet filed in San Francisco state court, settling defendants - including J&J's Neutrogena division, distributor Bergen Brunswig - would have to place Prop 65 warning on all coal tar-containing creams, as well as shampoos exceeding .5% coal tar equivalent. January trial date was vacated in light of settlements; remaining defendant Reedco is subsidiary of GlaxoSmithKline's Block Drug. Whitehall-Robins previously agreed to reformulateDenorex, pay $427,500 to settle the litigation (1"The Tan Sheet" Nov. 19, 2001, In Brief)...
Advertisement

Related Content

Coal tar litigation
Coal tar-less Denorex

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS093647

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel