Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Calcium lead limit settlements with supplement, antacid makers upheld in superior court.

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

LEAD IN CALCIUM PROP 65 SETTLEMENTS UPHELD BY CALIF. SUPERIOR COURT on June 23. Superior Court Judge William Cahill approved California Attorney General Dan Lungren's proposed settlements with eight dietary supplement and antacid manufacturers regarding lead levels in calcium supplements. The AG filed suit on Feb. 6 charging Warner-Lambert (Rolaids), SmithKline Beecham (Tums, Os-Cal), American Home Products (Caltrate), Schering-Plough (Di-Gel), Pharmavite (Nature Made), General Nutrition, Perrigo, Twin Labs and Source Naturals with selling products containing lead in excess of limits set in the state's Proposition 65 and not bearing the prescribed warnings ("The Tan Sheet" Feb. 10, p. 7).

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS087233

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel