Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Calcium lead limit settlements with supplement, antacid makers upheld in superior court.

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

LEAD IN CALCIUM PROP 65 SETTLEMENTS UPHELD BY CALIF. SUPERIOR COURT on June 23. Superior Court Judge William Cahill approved California Attorney General Dan Lungren's proposed settlements with eight dietary supplement and antacid manufacturers regarding lead levels in calcium supplements. The AG filed suit on Feb. 6 charging Warner-Lambert (Rolaids), SmithKline Beecham (Tums, Os-Cal), American Home Products (Caltrate), Schering-Plough (Di-Gel), Pharmavite (Nature Made), General Nutrition, Perrigo, Twin Labs and Source Naturals with selling products containing lead in excess of limits set in the state's Proposition 65 and not bearing the prescribed warnings ("The Tan Sheet" Feb. 10, p. 7).
Advertisement

Related Content

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS087233

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel