Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

P&G v. McNeil/Upjohn appeal: federal judge "improperly weighed the evidence," P&G says.

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

P&G v. McNEIL, UPJOHN: JUDGE ROBINSON "IMPROPERLY WEIGHED THE EVIDENCE" in coming to her decision that Rich-Vicks' patent for the combination of ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine is not valid and enforceable, the Procter & Gamble subsidiary asserted during a Dec. 4 oral argument before a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. Rich-Vicks is appealing federal Judge Sue Robinson's post-trial judgment for the defendants in the patent infringement suit, and McNeil and Pharmacia & Upjohn are cross-appealing ("The Tan Sheet" April 29, p. 5).
Advertisement

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS086439

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel