Setting the Stage: Qnexa and the Power of REMS
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Vivus’ second trip to an advisory panel was a much happier one, with the company’s weight loss therapy garnering an overwhelming “yes” vote on approvability. The key change? A Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy that will be precedent setting if approved—and that demonstrates the power of REMS even if FDA moves in a different direction with this application.
You may also be interested in...
Obesity Therapy Gap Or Regulatory Gap? REMS Not The Answer For Belviq Or GW Group
A common theme in FDA’s review of three different weight loss drugs has been discussion of whether a Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy program can help assure appropriate use of the therapies. FDA clearly thinks the answer is “no.” But that doesn’t end the discussion of what tools can be used to help curb off-label use.
FDAAA Impact Analysis (Year 4): The REMS Retreat Continues, But For How Long?
As the fifth year of the REMS era begins, FDA is imposing mandatory programs less frequently than it did even in the first year after the law creating formal risk management plans took effect. But there are some new trends to watch, including the evolution of REMS classes and the emergence of products with REMS-in-waiting.
Mis-Reading the Minutes: Arena Approval Follows Sell-Off Based on Advisory Committee Summary
Arena received great news June 27: approval of the weight loss therapy Belviq with a very clean label and no special marketing restrictions. That was what Wall Street expected—except when investors read the summary of the advisory committee review of the drug published by FDA on June 22.