The REMS Ramp Up: FDA Using New Safety Tools More Frequently In Year Two
This article was originally published in RPM Report
FDA has invoked formal Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy Authority almost as often the last five months as it did in the first full year of the program. Use of more intense REMS-those with communication plans and elements to assure safe use-is increasing even faster, and indications are this is the leading edge of a wave of new restrictive programs. REMS unquestionably delay approvals, FDA officials acknowledge-and yet, more drugs are coming out of FDA.
You may also be interested in...
FDA’s reconsideration of its new Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy authority put the brakes on use of the new post-marketing safety tools as 2011 began, and a formal decision not to require REMS for all products with mandatory MedGuides means a significant step down in use of REMS in the future. But that doesn’t mean REMS won’t be routine in the future.
Kaiser recognizes that some sponsors are trying to use REMS to make an end-run around gatekeepers, and it is fighting back. The non-profit integrated care system wants FDA to help, filing a citizen petition that could profoundly affect commercialization of new products in the US. The recently approved MS drug Ampyra offers a case-in-point.
The aducanumab review involved everything sponsors might think they could want from the US FDA, with the agency taking a hands on approach to expedite a complex and difficult review in hopes of delivering an important new therapy to patients as quickly as possible. Unfortunately, in this case, FDA seems to have expedited the review right over a cliff.