Debate At PSA 2013: Can ‘Dream Team’ Approach To Scientific Innovation Work for Big Pharma?
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily
How best to tap scientific innovation? Identifying the top ‘true’ innovators and nurturing them and their ideas in-house may work for biotechs like Regeneron, but the fruits of such efforts are too rare to be reliable growth engines for big companies like Pfizer. That’s one takeaway from a lively R&D chiefs debate at Elsevier’s PSA 2013.
You may also be interested in...
Regeneron’s five-year-old antibody partnership with Sanofi may be expensive, but it is starting to produce some interesting compounds in mid-to-late-stage clinical trials, with positive data to show.
The better-than-expected performance of Regeneron’s first significant commercial drug, Eylea, has fueled the company’s ambitions to build a sustainable, risk-adjusted portfolio based on a mix of best-in-class and first-in-class new drugs. Getting to this point took a mixture of perseverance, astute science, opportunism, and savvy partnering.
ACOs have been one of the most hyped innovations in the US health care sector this decade. The buzz may be overdone, but ACOs are now established as a different—and confusing—new customer segment for pharma. How is industry adjusting?