Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

AMP Rule Answers Questions On Collecting Pricing Data For “5i” Specialty Drugs Raised By Manufacturers

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

Manufacturers had asked CMS to explain the law pertaining to collecting average manufacturer prices for inhalation, infusion, instilled, implanted and injectable drugs “not generally dispensed through a retail community pharmacy” and how to identify such “5i” drugs.

You may also be interested in...



Medicaid Add-On Rebates For Line Extensions Remain A Judgment Call

Manufacturers must continue to use their discretion on which line extensions should be subject to inflation-based Medicaid rebates in lieu of guidance from CMS in its recent AMP final rule.

Medicaid AMP: Manufacturers Have Reason To Hope For Significant Changes In Final Rule

A major regulation that could reshape how the pharmaceutical industry reports drug pricing to the government and pays rebates on Medicaid drugs is slated to be released in final form in 2014. Some Medicaid regulatory experts suggest that CMS could make changes in the final rule that will make it less disruptive to manufacturers’ businesses than they have feared.

AMP Rule Tells Manufacturers To “Make Reasonable Assumptions” In Determining Fair Market Value For Service Fees

CMS’ proposed rule on average manufacturer prices for Medicaid relies on examples given in the Affordable Care Act for its list of “bona fide service fees” that manufacturers should exclude from the AMP calculation, but does not further expand on them. The proposed rule also avoids defining “fair market value” for such fees.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS073711

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel