The SHARP “Approval”: Merck Gets Vytorin Labeling Change, But Not The CV Outcomes Claim It Sought
FDA opted against a new indication for the ezetimibe/simvastatin combination because the SHARP trial in chronic kidney disease patients did not assess the independent contributions of each drug on the observed effect. There was no indication at a November advisory committee review that issues related to the “combination rule” would pose a barrier to a new claim.
You may also be interested in...
Pink Sheet Drug Review Profile looks at how the agency determined that Amylyx’s ‘conceptual basis’ for use of the drug’s two active ingredients to treat ALS was enough to satisfy the combination drug rule; the sponsor also was allowed to submit certain animal studies and drug-drug interaction data during the course of the NDA review.
Approval of cardiovascular risk reduction claims for Merck's Zetia and Vytorin would fly in the face of advisory committee's recommendations, but rejection would mean the first outcomes study to show CV benefit for a non-statin, LDL-C-lowering agent did not provide substantial evidence.
Agency’s trial design recommendations made it difficult to assess lumacaftor’s contribution to the lumacaftor/ivacaftor fixed-dose combination’s efficacy in cystic fibrosis. The experience may color FDA’s future approach to combination product trial designs and how it advises other ‘breakthrough therapy’ sponsors on the evidence likely needed to support approval.