Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

JAPANESE PATENT OFFICE SHOULD ELIMINATE SEVEN-YEAR DELAYS BEFORE EXAMINING PATENT APPLICATIONS, SMITHKLINE's LOURIE TESTIFIES AT SENATE HEARING, FEB. 28

Executive Summary

The Japanese Patent Office should eliminate its seven-year delay in examining patent applications, SmithKline Beckman VP-Corporate Patents & Trademarks Alan Lourie maintained at a Feb. 28 hearing on the Japanese patent system before the Senate Commerce/Foreign Commerce Committee. Testifying as chairman of the U.S. group of the Joint Patent Task Force of the U.S.-Japan Business Council, Lourie said Japan's current practice of deferring patent examinations for seven years extends "the long period of time before it is known whether and when a Japanese patent will be granted." The U.S. task group also supports "elimination of the pre-grant opposition system" by which competitors can contest an applicant's pending application before it is granted, Lourie testified. The Japanese group of the joint task force disagrees with the recommendation, he noted. They believe that "oppositions can eliminate patents that should not have been granted." The Japanese also defend deferred examinations as a means "to lessen the workload at the Japanese Patent Office and thereby shorten the pendency time," Lourie continued. The Japanese explain that deferrals result in "some patent applications not having to be examined." However, Lourie contended, "the data show that most of ]the applications[ are examined, and the delay serves only to defer the problem." Subcommittee Chairman Rockefeller (D- W.Va.) indicated that the Senate may commission a study of whether the Japanese use their system to obtain a competitive advantage. The senator's remark followed Lourie's statement that "more fact-finding and analysis of the kind that our task force could not undertake is necessary in order to better determine whether and to what extent the Japanese patent system has been utilized to the advantage of foreign competitors." Lourie also argued for a change in the Japanese system that would allow initial submission of patent applications in a foreign language. The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office allows such submissions, which "permit priority dates to be obtained" by foreign applicants, Lourie said. "Translations would, of course, be required before examination," he said, adding that the Japanese should permit correction of translation errors, based on the authentic text of a foreign priority document. Another change has the support of the Japanese. "The Japanese Patent Office is greatly understaffed," a situation that "results in a large backlog of pending applications," Lourie said. He pointed out that "both the U.S. and the Japanese groups of the joint task force support significant increases in staff to deal with the backlog." Another reason for the backlog already has been changed, he continued. Japan now accepts single patents that make multiple claims; this procedure should help reduce the number of applications filed. Lourie emphasized that Japan is not the source of major intellectual property protection problems experienced by U.S. industry. The pharmaceutical industry, for example, has requested trade sanctions against Brazil, Argentina, Korea, and Thailand for failure to recognize drug patents (see story, p. 6). Such problems "do not exist in the Japanese system," he pointed out. "In fact, Japan, the U.S. and Europe are allies in the World Intellectual Property Organization and in the General Agreement on Tariff & Trade in attempting to persuade other countries to improve and harmonize their patent systems." Lourie said "it would be incorrect to refer to the Japanese patent system as a non-tariff barrier to trade." The task group does "not think that legislative action is needed," Lourie added.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS142970

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel