Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

COMPUTER-ASSISTED NDA SUBMISSIONS ARE CONDITIONAL ON REVIEWING DIVISION's WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT FORMAT; AGREEMENT NECESSARY "WELL IN ADVANCE" OF FILING

Executive Summary

The submission of an NDA using computer technology is conditional on the FDA reviewing division's willingness to accept the application in the computer-assisted NDA (CANDA) format used by the sponsor, the agency said in a "guidance" on CANDAs published in the Sept. 15 Federal Register. For this reason, the guidance points out, "it is important that the acceptability of the proposed CANDA be established, to the degree it is possible, well in advance of the submission, before substantial effort has been expended." A drug sponsor intending to submit a CANDA "is encouraged to discuss its plans with CDER's [the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research's] Office of Management to identify and resolve potential problems involved in filing a CANDA," FDA said. In particular, the agency pointed out, "sponsors should be prepared to discuss possible logistical problems involved in the installation of computer equipment." The guidance begins by "encouraging drug sponsors to explore the use of CANDAs," and directs companies considering computer-assisted submissions to contact Robert Bell, director of the Office of Management at CDER. Computer technologies may be applied to INDs, ANDA, and antibiotic applications as well as to NDAs, the agency pointed out. The document solicits comments and suggestions regarding CANDAs by March 14, 1989. The guidance specifically requests input "that will help [FDA] develop an overall CANDA policy," as opposed to comments that "propose adoption of specific equipment, systems, computer programs, and services." CANDAs may be developed by the sponsor or by a third party, the agency noted. If the CANDA is contracted out to a third party, FDA said that sponsors should identify the developer of the CANDA during initial discussions with the agency. The guidance defines a CANDA as: "any method using computer technology to improve the transmission, storage, retrieval, and analysis of data submitted to FDA as part of the drug development and marketing approval process." Due to limited agency resources, reviewing divisions will provide "detailed consultation" on the development of CANDAs "only in the course of their ordinary regulatory discussions with sponsors," FDA said. The agency emphasized that "the reviewing divisions are not in a position to offer assistance directly to third party vendors who are not currently working with a sponsor involved in obtaining FDA marketing approval of a drug . . . (i.e., whose intention is to develop and market data processing methodology for use by drug sponsors)." Such third party vendors should contact Robert Bell, FDA said. Addressing speculation that computerized submissions may get a faster review at the agency than traditional hard copy NDAs, FDA maintained that the CANDA "will not influence the priority given to an application." During consultations with CDER, the drug sponsor should also be prepared to discuss: "general characteristics of the proposed application, including the methods and data files to be used"; "computer hardware requirements" and compatability with FDA equipment; computer software chosen; and "plans for CDER reviewer orientation and training," including "instructing reviewers in the use of the computer hardware, data file content and structure, and retrieval routines." The guidance adds that "sponsors should also be prepared to provide continuing technical support and advice to reviewing personnel."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1133833

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel