Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PERSANTINE RELABELING ANNOUNCEMENTS

Executive Summary

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PERSANTINE RELABELING ANNOUNCEMENTS are unacceptable to FDA because they mislead "health care professionals to believe that Persantine will soon be the only dipyridamole product available and that use of any other available product for the treatment of angina pectoris will soon be unlawful," FDA Office of Drug Standards Director Peter Rheinstein, MD, told the firm in an Aug. 24 regulatory letter. The regulatory letter objects to a series of letters the company issued to doctors, pharmacists, third-party-payors/formularies and buyers in February. The letters inform health professionals that Persantine has been relabeled to delete the angina indication, "while a new indication for use as an adjunct to coumarin anticoagulants in the prevention of postoperative thromboembolic complications of cardiac value replacement has been added." The letters also point out that Persantine is the only dipyridamole product to be approved for the new indication and that "the agency has now determined that . . . studies do not adequately demonstrate the effectiveness of dipyridamole in angina pectoris and has asked that the angina pectoris indication be removed from the labeling for dipyridamole." The reg letter maintains that the companies promotional letters are "false and/or misleading . . . by attempting to convince health care providers that FDA has made a final determination that dipyridamole is ineffective for the treatment of angina pectoris." FDA assumes, Rheinstein said, "that your firm is well aware of the fact that until such time as the agency denies or conducts [DESI hearings on the angina indication], all products are lawfully permitted to remain on the market with their current labeling." The regulatory letter also objects to the promotional letters' implication that "Persantine (dipyridamole) will soon be the only legally available product of dipyridamole on the market by virtue of the new indication for adjunctive use with coumarin postoperatively." The regulatory letter explains that Persantine may never have a period of exclusive marketing because of the typically lengthy DESI review hearing process. "Although your product may carry the exclusive indication until Dec. 22, 1989," Rheinstein said, "the hearing process for other DESI drugs has in the past taken a significant period of time before a final determination is made. It is very possible that the period of exclusivity will be expired before the final effectiveness of the drug in angina has been made." The agency was also critical of the suggestion in Boehringer Ingelheim's letter to buyers that supplies of Persantine be increased. "If Boehringer Ingelheim believes that dipyridamole is ineffective for angina pectoris, we fail to understand why you would urge health care professionals to increase their inventories. It would seem that the new approved indication for Persantine would significantly reduce the number of patients who might benefit from your product," Rheinstein said. "It appears that your firm is anticipating that, should Persantine become the only dipyridamole product on the market, there would be a significant use beyond the approved new indication (i.e., chronic use in angina pectoris)." FDA is requesting the company to "immediately cease to disseminate any materials which suggest that Persantine will soon be the only dipyridamole product on the market, or that any other existing dipyridamole product, which is the subject of an approved NDA, is unlawful or ineffective for its labeled use." The agency is also asking the firm to issue corrective letters "to each of the health care professionals who may have received" the February letters. The firm is instructed to inform the agency of its intentions to take corrective action within 10 days of receipt of the regulatory letter. FDA said it anticipates a response by Sept. 11.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

OM017175

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel