Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Lundbeck receives "complete response" from FDA for its schizophrenia drug

This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly

Executive Summary

FDA sends Lundbeck a "complete response" letter for its schizophrenia agent Serdolect (sertindole), reaching the same conclusion as its advisory committee: the atypical antipsychotic could be approved if Lundbeck can identify an appropriate patient population. Sertindole is clearly efficacious, but it also clearly has significant cardiovascular risk. The letter, announced June 25, requested "additional data to best understand the appropriate patient population for which Serdolect could be made available." At its April 7 review, the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted that, despite its lack of safety, the antipsychotic could be used in an acceptably safe manner in some patient groups (1"The Pink Sheet," April 13, 2009). But the panel couldn't pinpoint who those patients are, and so far neither can Lundbeck and FDA. Serdolect's user fee date was May 15

You may also be interested in...

FDA Complete Response Slows Down, But Won't Stop, Lundbeck's Serdolect

Agency comes to same conclusion as advisory committee: the risky schizophrenia drug could get approved if an appropriate patient group is identified.

Recent And Upcoming FDA Advisory Committee Meetings

Recent and upcoming US FDA advisory committee meetings and a summary of topics covered. 

OIG: FDA’s EUA Approach Allowed Bad Tests To Reach Market

A review by a government watchdog found the FDA’s review process for COVID-19 diagnostics was plagued by issues including allowing low-quality tests to slip through, high reviewer workloads, and manufacturer frustration.


Latest News
See All



Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts