Mircera Review Provided FDA With Forum To Suggest Ideal ESA Studies
This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly
Executive Summary
With FDA’s review of Roche’s Mircera BLA, the agency went beyond the normal evaluation leading to approval of the drug; it seized the opportunity to weigh in on the proper development of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
You may also be interested in...
Mircera Reviewers Turned To Top-Level FDA Briefing With CRP Concerns
Unlike trials of other ESAs, Roche’s Mircera studies excluded patients with elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker for inflammation. In a move reflective of growing use of interdisciplinary and cross-division expertise within FDA, the review division sought center-level “regulatory briefing” to determine if CRP screening produced a database that was not characteristic of the market. The briefing found the rate of exclusion due to CRP screening insufficient to delay approval of Mircera
Mircera Reviewers Turned To Top-Level FDA Briefing With CRP Concerns
Unlike trials of other ESAs, Roche’s Mircera studies excluded patients with elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker for inflammation. In a move reflective of growing use of interdisciplinary and cross-division expertise within FDA, the review division sought center-level “regulatory briefing” to determine if CRP screening produced a database that was not characteristic of the market. The briefing found the rate of exclusion due to CRP screening insufficient to delay approval of Mircera
To Market Or Not To Market? Roche Fights Amgen Patent Litigation
While FDA's review of the Mircera BLA offers a focal point for the agency's battle to keep ESA labeling abreast of ESA science, the Mircera molecule itself may not see the U.S. market.