Despite Widespread Adoption, Questions Persist on Benefits of QbD
This article was originally published in The Gold Sheet
The generic drug industry is continuing to question the benefits of quality by design, despite its widespread adoption. Generics firms are not seeing an increase in product approvals since making the shift to QbD nor are they seeing much regulatory relief in using this paradigm for making post-approval changes, as deficiency letters continue to focus on traditional ANDA shortcomings and QbD elements are not being observed.
You may also be interested in...
Ten years into FDA’s quality initiative, CDER Director Janet Woodcock acknowledges continued resistance to investing in QbD as a way of preventing quality problems in commercial manufacturing. Yet others in FDA and industry see adoption of the science- and risk-based approach spreading, even though manufacturers are often reluctant to disclose how much money it’s saving them.
Come January, if there is no quality target product profile (QTPP) in an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA), FDA might not file it, agency officials told a Generic Pharmaceutical Association workshop. Even though quality by design (QbD) remains optional for brand drugs, it will be expected for generics, said Office of Generic Drugs representatives who went on to outline pending question-based-review (QbR) revisions designed to elicit QbD information.
2020 is when supply chain partners must agree on a vision for the track-and-trace anticounterfeiting system due in November 2023, experts tell the Pink Sheet.