Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

UK Court Ruling Ends Novartis/Bayer Crusade Against Avastin In AMD

Off-Label Use Does Not Undermine Licensing System

Executive Summary

AMD patients in the UK can legitimately be given compounded bevacizumab (Roche’s Avastin) after the appeals court said NHS trusts could offer a drug off-label for economic reasons where there were no safety or efficacy concerns. 

You may also be interested in...



Avastin Can Be Used Off Label For AMD, Says UK MHRA

The UK regulator has clarified its guidance on the use of the anticancer Avastin for age-related macular degeneration, saying that reformulating the drug into small vials for ophthalmic injection represents an off-label use of the Roche product and does not create an unlicensed medicine.

EU Avastin Court Ruling Deals Yet Another Blow To Novartis

In the latest in a string of knockbacks for both Novartis and Roche, the EU’s highest court has said that the Italian authorities are within their rights to reimburse Roche’s Avastin for wet AMD, even though it is not approved for that indication.

English Court Queries EMA Primacy & Says Avastin Can Be Used In AMD

The English High Court has rejected attempts by Novartis and Roche to stop clinical commissioning groups from offering Avastin to wet AMD patients in a cost-containment move. In a development that has alarmed pharma firms, the court also questioned the exclusive role of the European Medicines Agency in marketing authorizations, saying that CCGs as well as the health technology assessment body, NICE, have competences in that area, and called on the UK regulator to review its guidance on off-label and unlicensed use.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS141934

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel