FDA Taking “Risk-Based Approach” To Sequestration Cuts

The agency will try to manage $319 million in potential funding reductions in a way that minimizes negative effects on health and safety, Commissioner Hamburg tells the Science Board, but significant layoffs seem unavoidable if sequestration is enacted.

In keeping with its approach to regulating medical products and foods, FDA is applying a risk-based view in determining how it would cut more than $300 million from its budget if sequestration passes.

“We will be looking at how to manage potential budget cuts in an across-the-board way, really trying to do it with a risk-based approach … in a way that will minimize negative impacts on people, health and safety,” FDA

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from United States

Novavax’s COVID-19 Vaccine Label Narrowed After Political Officials Intervened

 

The label that Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine was slated to receive before political officials held up the approval was broader than was granted 16 May.

Biomarker Negativity At Issue In Pfizer Bid To Broaden Talzenna CRPC Claim

 

The FDA questioned Pfizer’s reliance on a “large, incompletely defined” subgroup of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without known HRR gene alterations in its review of the proposed expansion of Talzenna’s first-line indication for HRR-mutated CRPC to an all-comers population.

UroGen’s Mitomycin: Are Randomized Trials For Bladder Cancer Necessary?

 
• By 

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will vote on the risk-benefit of UGN-102 for low-grade, intermediate-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on data from a single-arm trial, but the FDA also seeks input on requiring randomized studies for future treatments.

Life After Loper: Vaping Case Shows US FDA Retains Considerable Deference

 
• By 

A US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the agency in an e-cigarette case has implications for drugs and other medical products as the justices decided not to disturb the FDA’s ‘change in position’ authority, while also creating a complex new landscape.

More from North America

US FDA COVID-19 Booster Strategy May Not Be As Controversial As It Seems

 

US FDA Commissioner Martin Makary’s call for placebo-controlled trials to confirm the efficacy of COVID-19 boosters is drawing a lot of criticism, but former Commissioner Robert Califf also supported the idea.

US FDA Legislative Lead Calls For User Fee Reforms As Renewal Talks Near

 

Deputy FDA Commissioner Grace Graham acknowledged the importance of user fees, while also calling for restructuring. She also said part of MAHA's mission is to reexamine uses of drugs not supported by data.

Smoldering Myeloma Endpoint Questions Carry J&J’s Darzalex Faspro To US FDA AdComm

 

The US FDA seeks advice on the clinical meaningfulness of the endpoints of J&J’s AQUILA trial in smoldering multiple myeloma, highlighting the pitfalls of being the first candidate for the precancerous condition.