Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA Advisory Committees on the Brink: More Meetings, Fewer Members

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

A year ago, Congress sent FDA two very clear, somewhat contradictory messages: Hold more advisory committee meetings, but without the use of many expert panelists used in the past. The result is a system that is stretched to the limits.

You may also be interested in...



CDER Advisory Committee Staffing Improves, But Trouble Spots Remain

After years of widespread vacancies on advisory committees, the Food & Drug Administration appears to have tackled most of the problems. But there are a couple of significant outliers, most significantly the Dermatology & Ophthalmic Products Advisory Committee. Will changes in conflict of interest rules and a new recruitment effort help FDA find and retain advisory committee members?

Lone Wolfe: Drug Industry Critic Ends Tenure As Advisory Committee Member With Rare Decisive Vote

Sidney Wolfe’s stint as permanent member of the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee ended May 31; his final meeting was the May 23 review of Xarelto for ACS. That gave him a second chance to vote against the product. A look back at Wolfe’s tenure shows he was a sure “no” vote when he sat on a panel—but that his service can hardly be construed as having damaged the industry.

Conflict Over Conflicts: FDA Advisory Committee Rules May Be Ripe For Change

Recruitment of FDA advisory committee members has been a persistent challenge for the agency—especially since the conflict of interest rules were tightened five years ago. While FDA has improved the number of vacancies on its expert panels, it has yet to meet its goals—especially in the Center for Drugs. Congress is considering loosening the restrictions. Will that help, or simply fuel criticism of the process?

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1125120

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel