Changing the Subject (Part 3): The “All-Cancer Trial”
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Executive Summary
Rather than try to “win” the drug pricing debate, the biopharma sector may be better served by coming up with new ideas to change the subject. We outlined our case for taking this approach – and the model for ideas that serve that goal – here. Now we offer our second proposal: a nationwide clinical trial open to every patient with a cancer diagnosis.
You may also be interested in...
Rethinking Oncology Development: Master Protocols May Shorten Time To Approval
Master protocols that allow for the simultaneous study of multiple agents will shave more time off in the clinic than one-off studies in small groups of patients, FDA’s Janet Woodcock predicted. The current timeframes in oncology development are “unacceptable,” and can be shortened, she said, by “doing things differently.”
Medicare Reaffirms Faith In Formulary Review Process Ahead Of Part D Changes
Dramatic transformation in the US Medicare Part D benefit design does not require any changes to CMS’ overall approach to reviewing formulary submissions from private drug plan sponsors, the agency says in its final guidance implementing the design changes for 2025.
Cost-Based Pricing: The Real Threat Hiding In Latest US Drug Price Headlines
Bernie Sanders is back at it, getting headlines for demanding immediate price cuts to Novo’s blockbuster GLP-1 brands. But behind the familiar rhetoric is a newer threat: academic research on cost-based pricing that could one day feed into the emerging Medicare ‘negotiation’ system.