Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FTC's Health Care Reform Plan: Save $12 Billion With Reverse Settlement Ban

Executive Summary

The Federal Trade Commission has drawn another arrow in its attempt to shoot down reverse settlements between brand and generic drug companies - offering an estimate of $12 billion in government savings over the next 10 years from ending the practice

You may also be interested in...



Coverage, Courts And Congress: News In Brief

Congress again seeks to restrict reverse settlements: Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wis., proposed an amendment to a tax bill that would amend the Federal Trade Commission Act so that agreements between brand and generic companies to settle patent infringement claims are presumed to have anticompetitive effects if the ANDA filer receives anything of value and agrees to limit or forgo research, development or sales of its product. The presumption shall not apply if the parties "demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the precompetitive benefits of the agreement outweigh the anticompetitive effects of the agreement." Kohl introduced the amendment, SA 4332, on June 9 for inclusion in the American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act, H.R. 4213. Legislators had previously pushed for a similar amendment to render such deals illegal in the health care reform bill (1"The Pink Sheet," March 22, 2010)

Coverage, Courts And Congress: News In Brief

Congress again seeks to restrict reverse settlements: Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wis., proposed an amendment to a tax bill that would amend the Federal Trade Commission Act so that agreements between brand and generic companies to settle patent infringement claims are presumed to have anticompetitive effects if the ANDA filer receives anything of value and agrees to limit or forgo research, development or sales of its product. The presumption shall not apply if the parties "demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the precompetitive benefits of the agreement outweigh the anticompetitive effects of the agreement." Kohl introduced the amendment, SA 4332, on June 9 for inclusion in the American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act, H.R. 4213. Legislators had previously pushed for a similar amendment to render such deals illegal in the health care reform bill (1"The Pink Sheet," March 22, 2010)

No "Cert"-ainty On Reverse Settlements: Supreme Court Declines To Take Up Case

Lower courts had found Bayer’s agreement with Barr and Hoechst to delay generic Cipro to be lawful; Second Circuit is to rule on the deal.

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS051212

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel