Erivedge Efficacy Overcomes Limitations Of Single-Arm Study
This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly
Response rates of 30%-43% and a 7.6-month median duration of response were sufficiently clinically meaningful to allow FDA approval of Genentech’s basal cell carcinoma treatment on the basis of a non-randomized study.
You may also be interested in...
Case Studies In FDA's Regulatory Interpretation Of Clinical Trials
For more than 15 years, the Pink Sheet's Drug Review Profile series has looked closely at FDA approval documents, providing a long view of the pitfalls and pitches presented in the NEJM series on interpreting clinical trial results.
Randomization Required: Liver Signal Necessitated Kadcyla Trial With Control Arm
A pivotal trial with a control arm was necessary to evaluate a hepatotoxicity signal with Genentech’s Kadcyla, helping to derail a bid for accelerated approval based on a single-arm Phase II trial. Genentech’s strategy of running trials in different lines of treatment concurrently enabled a quick strategy shift as an ongoing controlled Phase III trial in another line was amended to meet FDA’s regulatory requests.
Regulatory Round-Up: Drug Review Profiles From 2012
Each month, Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly analyzes the FDA review process for a recent approval based on the NDA or BLA review documents. A detailed chronology of product development and listing of key reviewers accompany each profile. If you do not have access, contact customer care at 1-800-332-2181 for a free copy of any of these articles.