US FDA Fine-Tunes Tecentriq, Keytruda First-Line Bladder Cancer Accelerated Approval Indications
Executive Summary
FDA’s decision to restrict use based on the level of PD-L1 expression shows how confirmatory trials for accelerated approval can help to inform and adapt labeling.
You may also be interested in...
Keytruda's Urothelial Cancer Claim Goes From Accelerated To Full Approval, With More Limited Scope
US FDA showed some regulatory flexibility by relying on longer-term follow-up from Merck’s original single-arm trial, rather than additional confirmatory studies, to retain the first-line claim, but it narrowed the target population to those with the greatest unmet need; Keytruda indication was one of six 'dangling' accelerated approvals re-examined by Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee in April.
Accelerated Approval: US FDA Panel To Reconsider Six Indications For Checkpoint Inhibitors
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will meet for three days in April to consider whether indications for Tecentriq, Keytruda and Opdivo should remain on label despite failure to confirm clinical benefit; review is part of the Oncology Center of Excellence’s ‘industry-wide evaluation’ of accelerated approvals, which has led to withdrawals of four other PD-1/L-1 inhibitor claims.
Lynparza, Keytruda Supplemental Indications Face US FDA Panel Review
AstraZeneca and Merck seek to add a pancreatic cancer indication for olaparib, while Merck has hopes of broadening pembrolizumab’s use in bladder cancer; two-day Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting also will include reviews of Celgene’s luspatercept in myelodysplastic syndromes-related anemia and Epizyme’s tazemetostat for epithelioid sarcoma.