Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA Objects To Amarin Trade Complaint Against Omega-3 Ingredients

Executive Summary

FDA Chief Counsel Rebecca Wood says Amarin's request for an ITC investigation necessarily turns on questions of drug and supplements policy, where it is the expert and authorized agency. If successful, Amarin's move could encourage others to similarly seek alternative forums for action.

You may also be interested in...



Supreme Court Doesn't Bite On Amarin Appeal In Omega-3 Fair Trade Complaint

The court included its decision on Amarin’s ’s petition for a writ of certiorari among the single-line denials of nearly 200 appeals to consider decisions in civil litigation and convictions in criminal cases. However, Amarin still eyes curbing competition from omega-3 supplements.

Amarin Not Giving Up On Omega-3 Trade Battle

Amarin asks Federal Circuit Court to direct US ITC to investigate its complaint that some omega-3 ingredients are unapproved drugs. Company questions FDA's request for policy deference given resource constraints and says Supreme Court rulings show compliance with FDA regulations in cosmetic and food labeling does not preclude litigation alleging the information renders a product an unapproved drug or represents false advertising.

Amarin Not Giving Up On Omega-3 Trade Battle

Amarin asks Federal Circuit Court to direct US ITC to investigate its complaint that some omega-3 ingredients are unapproved drugs. Company questions FDA's request for policy deference given resource constraints and says Supreme Court rulings show compliance with FDA regulations in cosmetic and food labeling does not preclude litigation alleging the information renders a product an unapproved drug or represents false advertising.

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS121745

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel