US Comparator Requirement For Interchangeable Biosimilars Would Hurt Industry
Executive Summary
US FDA’s recommendation against use of foreign-licensed reference products in clinical switching studies would result in procurement challenges and higher costs for biosimilar developers while also limiting where such studies could be conducted, some companies say.
You may also be interested in...
Biosimilar Interchangeability Switching Studies May Use Foreign Comparators, US FDA Says
But scientific bridging required for non-US reference products might be more extensive than in other contexts, agency cautions; easing of the US comparator-only recommendation is one of several changes from the 2017 draft guidance that could make pursuing an interchangeability designation easier.
Biosimilar Bridging Study Waivers: Public Health Prerogative Or Trade Secret ‘Taking’?
US FDA and PhRMA may be headed for showdown over use of foreign reference product bridging studies; PhRMA says that relying on sponsor’s non-public information to waive bridging studies would violate firm’s commercial confidential information, while FDA Commissioner Gottlieb sees ‘public health prerogative’ in considering whether data-sharing agreements with foreign regulators could help eliminate need for unnecessary studies.
Biosimilar Bridging Study Waivers: Public Health Prerogative Or Trade Secret ‘Taking’?
US FDA and PhRMA may be headed for showdown over use of foreign reference product bridging studies; PhRMA says that relying on sponsor’s non-public information to waive bridging studies would violate firm’s commercial confidential information, while FDA Commissioner Gottlieb sees ‘public health prerogative’ in considering whether data-sharing agreements with foreign regulators could help eliminate need for unnecessary studies.