California Proposal To Amend Prop 65 Identifies 12 Label Warnings
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
California’s draft rule clarifies manufacturer and retailer responsibilities under Prop 65, addresses warnings provided in electronic retail settings and proposes identifying specific chemicals of concern – including phthalates – in the text of warnings.
You may also be interested in...
Prop 65 Litigation Targets Direct, Catalog Sales, Prioritizes Supplements
Supplement and food firms “major” targets still of Prop 65 private enforcers, including the primary bounty hunter Environmental Research Center, which has gone after many retail-distributed supplement brands and now has direct and catalog sales in its crosshairs.
National Advertising Division Shuts Down Skincarebrandsreviews Website
NourishMax agreed to discontinue “top pick” claims for its Diamond Infused Eye Cream and fold up its website that looked suspiciously to NAD like advertising in the guise of independent, honest reviews.
Cue The Class Actions! Plaintiffs React To Valisure’s Benzene Findings In Acne Drug Products
J&J, Target and Walgreens face class action complaints in California federal courts for economic harms caused by their sale of benzoyl peroxide-containing acne treatments, following Valisure’s 5 March citizen petition to the US FDA on findings of high levels of benzene in such products.