Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Are The 90s Back? Oncologics Drove FDA’s 2012 Novel Approval Count To 15-Year High

This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly

Executive Summary

With 45 new molecular entities and novel biologics cleared in 2012, FDA approvals have reached a level not seen since the mid-1990s, the golden age of modern medicine. The group reflects a boom in oncology; other drug development trends like orphan diseases and personalized medicine held steady. Big pharma contributed just over a third of the 2012 class, with Pfizer regaining the lead with five novel approvals.

You may also be interested in...



With 37 Novel Approvals in 2022, US FDA CDER’s Five-Year Hot Streak Comes To An End; Gene Therapies Carry CBER To 8 Novel Approvals

US FDA’s novel agent count fell back to average as agency kept up high rate of complete response letters and refuse to file actions; CBER’s workload shifted to regenerative medicine.

New Drugs In 2013 Show A Virtuous Cycle: First-Cycle Approvals Up, Review Times Down

Even with half of CDER’s approvals qualifying for longer review timeframes under “the program,” the average time from submission to approval continued its multi-year decline, helped by a record high level of first-cycle approvals. Small molecules and big pharma dominated the 2013 class.

What Innovation Crisis? First-In-Class Drug Approvals Stable For Almost 25 Years, FDA Says

An FDA study evaluating NMEs by level of innovation finds level first-in-class approvals to be consistent, and approvals after the study period reinforce “encouraging” findings. Analysis says new metric should be basis for assessment of programs created by FDASIA to speed development of innovative products.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS005217

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel