“Piggyback” Lawsuits Spur NAD To Clarify Purpose Of Investigations
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Class-action lawsuits filed following National Advertising Division decisions raise concerns among firms participating in NAD’s self-regulatory process. The advertising industry’s voluntary self-regulation program clarifies that its findings do not indicate any laws have been violated.
You may also be interested in...
Class-Actions Increasing As Fallout From Regulatory Action
Using marketing claims that overstep cosmetic boundaries can land firms in class-action suits that sap resources and drag on for years, attorneys noted at the ACI Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Forum on Cosmetics. Speakers provided examples and tips for staying out of court.
Class-Actions Increasing As Fallout From Regulatory Action
Using marketing claims that overstep cosmetic boundaries can land firms in class-action suits that sap resources and drag on for years, attorneys noted at the ACI Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Forum on Cosmetics. Speakers provided examples and tips for staying out of court.
NAD Participation Poses Minimal Class-Action Risk – Attorney Analysis
An investigation led by attorney John Villafranco, a partner with Kelley Drye & Warren, suggests that the risk of incurring a consumer class-action lawsuit as a result of participating in NAD’s self-regulatory process is “much lower than many have assumed it to be.”