Sponsors Can Expect REMS Discussions As Early As Phase II, FDA Says
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily
Executive Summary
Though REMS requirements caused longer reviews in 2008, FDA Deputy Director Office of New Drugs Sandra Kweder said the agency expects "we will be doing this better and it will not affect PDUFA deadlines" going forward.
You may also be interested in...
REMS Reform Looks To Be Theme Of PDUFA V: Stakeholders Call For Standardization, Earlier Notice
The biggest changes that came out of the FDA Amendments Act, the last round of Prescription Drug User Fee Act reauthorization, were FDA's augmented drug safety authorities, most specifically the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy tool. Going into the next round of PDUFA negotiations, a major focus will be on improving the implementation of the REMS program
REMS Reform Looks To Be Theme Of PDUFA V: Stakeholders Call For Standardization, Earlier Notice
The biggest changes that came out of the FDA Amendments Act, the last round of Prescription Drug User Fee Act reauthorization, were FDA's augmented drug safety authorities, most specifically the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy tool. Going into the next round of PDUFA negotiations, a major focus will be on improving the implementation of the REMS program
Priority Review's Luster Dims In "Safety First Era" But Retains Value - Parexel
Sponsors of the most innovative new drugs should not be deterred by the apparent reversals of fortune for new molecular entities with priority review status in the last year, the consulting firm Parexel concludes in a new report