Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Citizen Petition Changes In FDAAA Force Firms To Reconsider Timing Strategy

Executive Summary

Legislative changes to the citizen petition process are forcing would-be petitioners to reevaluate when they should submit their petitions to the FDA

You may also be interested in...



Teva gets (non)response from FDA on Copaxone

Teva's petition requesting that ANDAs for its multiple sclerosis treatment Copaxone (glatiramer) should contain clinical data has been nominally rejected by FDA. 1FDA's denial is made "without comment on the approvability" of any application "because it would be premature and inappropriate to do so at this time." The response appears to be part of the agency's new strategy of answering petitions within the 180-day congressional deadline but not reaching a definitive conclusion on the questions because applications may still be undergoing review. The denials have frustrated firms, which are left with the choice of suing the agency or repetitioning, but FDA thinks the approach is "pretty clever" (2"The Pink Sheet," March 2, 2009, p. 29)

Teva gets (non)response from FDA on Copaxone

Teva's petition requesting that ANDAs for its multiple sclerosis treatment Copaxone (glatiramer) should contain clinical data has been nominally rejected by FDA. 1FDA's denial is made "without comment on the approvability" of any application "because it would be premature and inappropriate to do so at this time." The response appears to be part of the agency's new strategy of answering petitions within the 180-day congressional deadline but not reaching a definitive conclusion on the questions because applications may still be undergoing review. The denials have frustrated firms, which are left with the choice of suing the agency or repetitioning, but FDA thinks the approach is "pretty clever" (2"The Pink Sheet," March 2, 2009, p. 29)

Ranbaxy’s First-To-File ANDAs At Risk In FDA Data Integrity Probe

Several first-to-file ANDAs are on the line for Ranbaxy as it tries to resolve data integrity issues at its Paonta Sahib facility with FDA

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS050744

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel