Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA Panel Says Arpida’s Iclaprim Inferior To Comparator

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

Advisory committee votes down the antibiotic based on the non-inferiority margin and problems with the clinical study and its results.

You may also be interested in...



More clinical data required for iclaprim application:

Arpida did not demonstrate efficacy of its anti-infective iclaprim for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections within an acceptable non-inferiority margin, FDA says in a "complete response" letter. An additional study showing non-inferiority of intravenous iclaprim to an approved comparator may be sufficient to meet this requirement, depending on study results, Arpida said Jan. 19. A resubmission will likely also provide updated safety data and labeling information. The letter was not a surprise, said CEO Jurgen Raths in a company release; a November advisory panel voted 17-2 against the drug's safety and efficacy (1"The Pink Sheet" DAILY, Nov. 20, 2008). Arpida slashed three-fourths of its workforce and will seek expert advice on further clinical development for iclaprim (2"The Pink Sheet," Dec. 22, 2008, In Brief)

More clinical data required for iclaprim application:

Arpida did not demonstrate efficacy of its anti-infective iclaprim for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections within an acceptable non-inferiority margin, FDA says in a "complete response" letter. An additional study showing non-inferiority of intravenous iclaprim to an approved comparator may be sufficient to meet this requirement, depending on study results, Arpida said Jan. 19. A resubmission will likely also provide updated safety data and labeling information. The letter was not a surprise, said CEO Jurgen Raths in a company release; a November advisory panel voted 17-2 against the drug's safety and efficacy (1"The Pink Sheet" DAILY, Nov. 20, 2008). Arpida slashed three-fourths of its workforce and will seek expert advice on further clinical development for iclaprim (2"The Pink Sheet," Dec. 22, 2008, In Brief)

J&J/Basilea’s Ceftobiprole Gets Another Setback

FDA stops the investigational antibiotic’s six-month review clock for additional clinical site audits, data integrity review.

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS067045

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel