Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Concomitant Use Of Macugen With Visudyne Appears Safe, Cmte. Says

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

Concomitant use of Pfizer/Eyetech's Macugen (pegatanib) with Novartis/QLT's Visudyne (verteporfin) does not pose safety concerns, FDA's Dermatologic & Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee concluded Aug. 27.

Concomitant use of Pfizer/Eyetech's Macugen (pegatanib) with Novartis/QLT's Visudyne (verteporfin) does not pose safety concerns, FDA's Dermatologic & Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee concluded Aug. 27.

"I think it's been explored sufficiently, and I don't have concerns about concomitant use," voting consultant Scott Steidl, MD (Baltimore) said during the advisory committee's review of Macugen for the treatment of neovascular (or "wet") age-related macular degeneration.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin is currently the only approved treatment for AMD, with an indication limited to patients with the predominantly classic form of the disease.

In Macugen clinical trials, doctors were permitted to administer PDT to patients; however, patients were not randomized to PDT (1 (Also see "Macugen Advisory Committee To Discuss Concomitant Use With Visudyne" - Pink Sheet, 25 Aug, 2004.)).

Only 25% of patients received PDT at any time, according to the 2 sponsors' briefing documents.

The committee voted 9-0 that the concomitant use of Macugen with Visudyne had been sufficiently explored, even though the number of patients who received both therapies was too small to allow any conclusions about the influence of Visudyne.

"I would just have to caution...that there are small numbers, but the data they do have don't raise a concern for me," voting committee consultant Jeffrey Lehmer, MD, (Bakersfield, Calif.) said.

"The number of patients who received photodynamic therapy…were so small that we really can't make any conclusions about whether receiving photodynamic therapy before or during the trial has any effect on the efficacy results," FDA Division of Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic & Ophthalmic Drug Products Medical Officer Jennifer Harris, MD, said.

Committee members and the sponsors agreed that future studies should explore possible effects from concomitant use.

"I think we would all like to know ultimately if there's a synergistic effect," Steidl said.

"One of the things that was important to us when we designed this trial was to try to make it as much of a real world trial as possible, and that's why we allowed photodynamic therapy," Eyetech CEO David Guyer, MD, said.

"I agree with you that certainly future trials will be able to address those issues and it's important," he added.

- John Rancourt, Andrew Shelton

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS060415

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel