‘Skinny Label’ Case Gives Brands A ‘Blueprint’ To Alter Use Codes In Patent Litigation
Executive Summary
Federal Circuit ruling in GSK v. Teva shows brands can broaden a use code to include other patented indications years into litigation, AAM attorney says. The case is ‘scarier’ for biosimilar makers since they must market their products, Teva lawyer notes.
You may also be interested in...
FDA, USPTO Collaboration Could Expand Review Of Pharma Patents, Explore ‘Skinny Label’ Policy
The two agencies are pursuing initiatives to address instances of patents being used improperly to delay competition. FDA may play greater role in PTAB proceedings and training patent examiners.
Is CREATES Act Equipped To Handle Biosimilar Complaints?
Biosimilar sponsors need multiple reference product lots and expiration dates, and questions remain about whether they can obtain enough to fulfill all regulatory requirements under a CREATES Act mandate, Teva attorney says.
Is CREATES Act Equipped To Handle Biosimilar Complaints?
Biosimilar sponsors need multiple reference product lots and expiration dates, and questions remain about whether they can obtain enough to fulfill all regulatory requirements under a CREATES Act mandate, Teva attorney says.