Cancer Trials: Beware Of ‘Digital Exhaust’ When Planning Clinical Outcome Assessments
Executive Summary
Patient data gathered through wearables and sensors can complement traditional patient-reported outcome assessments, but continuous digital monitoring runs the risk of overburdening clinical trial participants.
You may also be interested in...
Standardization Of Patient-Focused Core Clinical Outcomes Could Enable Labeling Comparisons
US FDA’s Theresa Mullin envisions having a national catalog of standard core clinical outcomes assessment measures that could apply to every disease area.
Cancer Trials: Patient-Reported Outcomes Should Measure Five Core Concepts, US FDA Says
Heterogeneity in PRO assessment strategies has lessened the regulatory utility of such data from cancer trials, the agency says; new draft guidance recommends systematic assessment of a core set of PROs in registrational studies using fit-for-purpose tools and includes examples of acceptable instruments.
US FDA Gene Therapy Accelerated Approval Guidance Will Describe ‘Buckets’ Of Use Scenarios
Forthcoming guidance is expected to describe areas of “low-hanging fruit” and those that are more challenging for use of the expedited pathway, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks said.