Patent Day At The Supreme Court: A Split Decision On Split Decisions?
Executive Summary
US justices appear divided on whether Patent Trial and Appeal Board can issue a final decision on only some of patent claims challenged. Justice Sotomayor said petitioner is trying to get around the court's Cuozzo decision, but others cited ambiguity in the statute and efficiency of tackling all claims.
You may also be interested in...
Inter Partes Patent Challenges Are Constitutional, US Supreme Court Rules
But Patent Trial and Appeals Board must issue final written decision on all claims raised by challenger – not just some of them, court says; rulings in two closely watched cases mean that IPR proceedings can continue unabated, but generic drug and biosimilar sponsors may need to rethink how they go about challenging innovator patent claims.
Inter Partes Patent Challenges Are Constitutional, US Supreme Court Rules
But Patent Trial and Appeals Board must issue final written decision on all claims raised by challenger – not just some of them, court says; rulings in two closely watched cases mean that IPR proceedings can continue unabated, but generic drug and biosimilar sponsors may need to rethink how they go about challenging innovator patent claims.
Biosimilar Legal Landscape: Lessons From 2017
In several firsts last year, US Supreme Court ruled on BPCIA, Amgen won a damages award in infringement litigation, and Amgen and Mylan inked deals clearing way for future launch of Humira and Herceptin biosimilars. Chart includes status of 15 cases and questions teed up for courts to tackle in 2018.