Mucinex On Target In DayQuil Comparison Despite Disparate Formulations
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
RB’s ad comparing Mucinex Fast-Max Liquid Gels to Procter & Gamble’s DayQuil LiquiCaps is not misleading because, even though they have different formulations, the products compared were clearly identified, the National Advertising Division says.
You may also be interested in...
Mucinex Fast-Max Advertising Claim Exceeds Indications In NAD Review
Review was second in two years by the Council of Better Business Bureaus' National Advertising Division of a challenge to Reckitt Benckiser ad claims for its Mucinex cough/cold line made by Procter & Gamble, which markets competing products including Vicks NyQuil and DayQuil brands.
Mucinex Fast-Max Advertising Claim Exceeds Indications In NAD Review
Review was second in two years by the Council of Better Business Bureaus' National Advertising Division of a challenge to Reckitt Benckiser ad claims for its Mucinex cough/cold line made by Procter & Gamble, which markets competing products including Vicks NyQuil and DayQuil brands.
Fenty Cleanser Performance Claims Supported, But Influencer Videos Need Disclaimers – NAD
A National Advertising Division review of claims by LVMH-owned Fenty Skin determined makeup- and dirt-removal representations were substantiated by a study and subject questionnaire, but demo videos from paid endorsers must include disclosures about material connections in accordance with FTC guidelines.