Provectus Breakthrough Denial Is Symptom Of a Different Breakthrough at FDA
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Executive Summary
Provectus Pharmaceuticals raised a few eyebrows by raising the curtain on FDA’s rejection of its Breakthrough status application for its malignant melanoma drug. By making the letter public, the company shed light on the broader issue of how seriously FDA is taking symptom improvement as a component of clinical meaningfulness in some cancers.
You may also be interested in...
COPD Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire Is Early Example of FDA Drug Development Tool “Approval” Process
FDA finalizes the "qualification process for drug development tools." The topic won't get as much attention as Breakthrough Therapy or Accelerated Approval, but the head of the drug center thinks this is a very big deal. A COPD outcomes assessment is an early example of the process in action.
FDA Looking To Patient Advocates To Answer Benefit-Risk Questions
FDA’s clinical review teams are starting to approve novel drugs and biologics using a new structured benefit-risk framework developed under PDUFA V. Those assessments ask reviewers to think more broadly about the disease and how a new treatment might fit into the current treatment model. But many reviewers don’t have that information. And that, FDA says, is where patient advocates come in.
US Price Negotiation Hearing Lays The Groundwork For Future Improvements
The pharma industry is hoping that litigation might end Medicare price negotiation before it begins. But a House hearing also starts the process of developing legislative improvements that might be viable in years to come – starting with trying to restore the lifespan of small molecules.