Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Genentech’s Cancer Product Line Expands, As Do Its Post-Market Manufacturing Obligations

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

Genentech appears to be having significant manufacturing problems for some of its new cancer therapies. FDA hasn’t taken enforcement action yet, but the agency has delayed two approvals and tied them to post-market requirements to address QC issues.

You may also be interested in...



FDA’s “Breakthrough” Evolves: What’s Next For The Popular Program?

FDA’s second wave of Breakthrough Therapies will look markedly different from the initial flurry of approvals. After an early focus on oncology, FDA is reviewing a more diverse set of applications in the antiviral, vaccines and cardiovascular arenas. And there will be more “breaks” during development as sponsors start to request designations based on earlier data. What will Breakthrough look like in the third year of the program?

Expanded Access Theme Is One Sour Note For Biopharma In “21st Century Cure” Roundtable

The Energy & Commerce Committee “21st Century Cures” Process promises to set a pro-innovation tone heading into the next user fee reauthorization cycle. There is one theme, however, that may be perilous for industry moving forward: Expanded Access.

Kadcyla Manufacturing Review Was A Production In Itself

The complex manufacturing required by Genentech’s antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine pushed FDA’s review two months past the agency’s internal action timetable, required four review teams from three CDER offices and produced a veritable blizzard of information requests. But is that level of intensity sustainable as the expanding ADC pipeline matures?

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS081109

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel