CER Credibility Lies In Methodology For Studies, Physician Tells BIO
Executive Summary
The credibility of comparative effectiveness research ultimately will be judged based on the methodology used to conduct the research, David Charles, associate professor and vice-chairman of neurology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and chairman of the physician group Alliance for Patient Access, told attendees during a session at the Biotechnology Industry Organization International Convention.
You may also be interested in...
PCORI Shifts Focus To Dissemination Of Research Findings
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute expects its blueprint for disseminating the clinical comparative research it funds ready about when the first projects are complete in early 2014.
Dissemination Of CER Evidence Remains Key Challenge, PCORI Survey Suggests
Getting clinicians to access, let alone adopt, clinical comparative effectiveness research findings continues to loom as a key challenge, results from a recent PCORI survey suggest.
Thirteen Principles For Conducting CER, According To United BioSource Exec
During a recent DIA-sponsored conference, United BioSource Corp.’s Bryan Luce previewed a paper that will outline 13 principles that should be taken into account when developing comparative effectiveness research.