Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Vitacost stockholder shakes up board

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Great Hill Equity Partners, the largest holder of stock in Vitacost.com, will replace four company directors following a vote by Vitacost investors. An independent inspector of election confirmed the results July 21. Ira Kerker, CEO of Boca Raton, Fla.-based Vitacost, said, "The company's stockholders have spoken and we respect their decision." Great Hill offered its director nominees after communicating disppointment with the supplement retailer's flat sales growth and troubled manufacturing (1"The Tan Sheet" May 31, 2010, In Brief)

You may also be interested in...



Vitacost.com Turns To Vitamin Shoppe Founder To Right Ship

Vitacost.com CEO Ira Kerker steps down and Jeffrey Horowitz takes the post after logistics challenges and a proxy fight shook up the company's board of directors

Vitacost faces dissident shareholder

Boca Raton, Fla.-based Vitacost.com hires a financial advisor to help it identify "potential business combination partners and purchaser candidates." The May 20 announcement came five days before Vitacost's largest shareholder, Great Hill Equity Parnters, proposed four nominees to replace current board members. The shareholder explained the online dietary supplement retailer has experienced "significant erosion in stockholder value" since its 2009 initial public offering, according to a release. Great Hill attributes Vitacost's flat sales growth, high turnover and troubled manufacturing and logistics to "a board comprised of directors with little, if any, public company or Internet, eCommerce or direct marketing experience.

Cosmetic And Personal Care Trademark Review: 16 April

Personal care and cosmetic product trademark filings compiled from the Official Gazette of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Class 3.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS104346

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel