Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FTC finalizes Kellogg consent order

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The Federal Trade Commission approves a final consent order to resolve allegations Kellogg Company falsely advertised Frosted Mini-Wheats as "clinically shown to improve kids' attentiveness nearly 20 percent." The Commission said data Kellogg relied on to make the claim was self-contradictory and did not support the statement (1"The Tan Sheet" April 27, 2009)

You may also be interested in...



Despite FTC's "Timid" Kellogg Action, Rigorous Claims Enforcement Expected

The Federal Trade Commission's enforcement against advertising claims for Kellogg's Rice Krispies cereal appears relatively soft, but dietary supplement firms should not expect the action signals a less stringent approach by the agency, industry stakeholders say

Kellogg settles with FTC

Kellogg Co. settles Federal Trade Commission allegations that it falsely advertised Frosted Mini-Wheats as "clinically shown to improve kids' attentiveness by nearly 20 percent." The commission alleged that the study Kellogg relied on for the claim shows only one in nine children's attentiveness improved by 20 percent or more, according to an April 20 FTC release. The commission also alleged that the study shows children who ate the cereal for breakfast were on average 11 percent more attentive than those who skipped breakfast. This contradicts the company's claim that attentiveness improved 20 percent, the commission says. The settlement prohibits Kellogg from making unsubstantiated claims and misrepresenting study results, but does not impose a fine or consumer redress

Cosmetic And Personal Care Trademark Review: 16 April

Personal care and cosmetic product trademark filings compiled from the Official Gazette of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Class 3.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS103211

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel