Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Nplate Déjà Vu: FDA Delays GSK’s Promacta PDUFA Date

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

Fears over long-term use led to three-month postponement.

FDA's decision to extend the PDUFA date for GlaxoSmithKline's thrombopoietin receptor agonist Promacta by three months doesn't surprise analysts, given the agency's previously stated concerns about risk management.

The PDUFA date for once-daily Promacta (eltrombopag), partnered with Ligand Pharmaceuticals, has been shifted to September 19 from June 19.

"This really is not a major shocker," Derek Jellinek, Susquehanna analyst, told "The Pink Sheet" DAILY.

The British drugmaker had submitted an application for the oral drug in second-line treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura to increase platelet counts and reduce or prevent bleeding in December.

Amgen's Nplate (romiplostim), another stalled thrombocytopenia drug, had also stirred risk management concerns (1 (Also see "FDA Delays Action On Amgen’s Nplate" - Pink Sheet, 8 Apr, 2008.)).

At the end of May, a panel of FDA's Oncologics Advisory Committee voted unanimously in favor of Promacta for short-term treatment but questioned whether GSK would be able to limit off-label, long-term use (2 (Also see "ODAC Unanimously Recommends GSK’s Promacta For ITP" - Pink Sheet, 30 May, 2008.)).

Writing in a research note at the time, Jellinek and colleague Andrew Peters observed that the June PDUFA date was not "set in stone," and any delay "would likely depend on GSK's capability to quickly augment its risk management plan to sufficiently answer many of the agency's outstanding safety concerns, including weekly monitoring of liver enzyme levels and bone marrow biopsy for many patients."

Thousand Oaks, Calif.-based Amgen also needed to come up with a solid risk-management program after a unanimously favorable committee vote and its decision date was set back to July 23 from April 23.

The Promacta delay is a negative in that it extends timetables, but the drug should win approval in September, Jellinek told the DAILY.

-Emily Hayes ([email protected])

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS067957

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel