Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA Panel Advice To Limit Aquavan Administration Would Also Limit Market

Executive Summary

If FDA takes an advisory panel's advice to limit approval of MGI Pharma's Aquavan (fospropofol) to administration only by trained anesthesiologists, the market for the sedative - which would then compete directly with its active moiety, propofol - would be substantially limited

You may also be interested in...



Eisai Wins Approval Of Sedative Lusedra, But Without Main Marketing Advantage

Company was hoping to position Lusedra as an anesthetic that did not require the presence of an anesthesiologist.

Eisai’s Aquavan “not approvable”

Eisai receives a "not approvable" action letter for its sedative fospropofol, the firm says July 25. An FDA advisory committee recommended approval of fospropofol for patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in May, but suggested limiting it to administration by trained anesthesiologists, thereby obviating any marketing advantage over its active moiety, propofol (1"The Pink Sheet," May 12, 2008, p. 13). The sponsor had hoped that the prodrug would have a sufficiently distinct safety profile to allow for general administration

Eisai’s Aquavan “not approvable”

Eisai receives a "not approvable" action letter for its sedative fospropofol, the firm says July 25. An FDA advisory committee recommended approval of fospropofol for patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in May, but suggested limiting it to administration by trained anesthesiologists, thereby obviating any marketing advantage over its active moiety, propofol (1"The Pink Sheet," May 12, 2008, p. 13). The sponsor had hoped that the prodrug would have a sufficiently distinct safety profile to allow for general administration

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS049610

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel